Arrow icon Printer icon PlayFC logo PlayFC logo

Local Football Facility Plan Rutland

Introduction

01

This is the Local Football Facility Plan (LFFP) for Rutland. It was prepared by Knight, Kavanagh and Page (KKP) with support from local partners, including:

  • Rutland County Council
  • Leicestershire and Rutland County FA
  • Football Foundation
  • Sport England

What is the goal?

Every local area in the Country will have a LFFP to enable investment in football facilities to be accurately targeted.

Who is behind this?

The Football Association, the Premier League and Sport England (on behalf of Government). This partnership finances the National Football Facility Strategy (NFFS) and commissions the Football Foundation to deliver it.

What is the purpose of this plan?

The national funding partners have significantly increased investment to accelerate efforts to deliver more and better football facilities for the grassroots game. The purpose of this plan is to identify the priority projects for potential investment in Rutland.

National Context 1.png
Disability 2

Why invest in football facilities?

As the nation’s most popular team sport, football has the power to contribute positively to vital social outcomes and health priorities. To maximise this power, facilities have to be welcoming environments to attract first-time users and repeat visits, whether for informal, recreational or competitive football.

Research clearly and continually demonstrates the positive impact high-quality football facilities, in the right locations, can have on participation and enjoyment. Latent demand exists, but facility quantity and quality has to ‘step up’ if football is to reach out to everyone.

How are we going to do it?

£1.3billion has been spent by football and Government since 2000 to enhance existing football facilities and build new ones. However, more is needed if football and Government’s shared objectives for participation, individual well-being and community cohesion are to be achieved.

Nationally, direct investment will be increased – initially to £69 million per annum from football and Government (a 15% increase on recent years). Locally, the work has already started* - this LFFP will guide the allocation of 90% of national funds and forge stronger partnerships with local stakeholders to develop key sites. This, together with local match-funding will deliver over one billion pounds of investment into football facilities over the next 10-years.

What are the priorities for investment?

This LFFP, with guidance from local partners, has developed a list of high level projects for potential investment. Each is aligned to the investment priorities set out in the National Football Facilities Strategy, which include:

  • 1,000 new 3G football turf pitches (FTPs): in a mix of sizes and settings, dependent upon local needs. All aimed at enhancing the quality of the playing experience.
  • 20,000 improved natural-turf pitches: to help address drop-off due to a poor playing experience.
  • 1,000 new changing pavilions / clubhouses: all linked to priority sites.
  • Small-sided facilities: to grow the small-sided game for teams & leagues, recreational and informal play.

What outcomes will be achieved?

The priority projects for potential investment identified in this plan will help develop a sustainable network of quality facilities to drive participation across all parts of the game. Central to this are five key success factors: quality, inclusivity, sustainability, engagement and usage. Each identified project takes account of these factors.

The project list sets out all priority projects for potential investment. Each has been scored against two principal factors: deliverability and the five key outcomes (as stated above).

The list will be used flexibly; project ‘rating’ does not determine the exact order in which it will progress to a funding application to the Football Foundation, as many factors influence this. The process for moving a project from this list and into the ‘pre-application stage’ will be managed by the Football Foundation.

How should this plan be used?

This LFFP will, in effect, be the go-to document for football facility investment in Rutland.

Whilst it identifies priority projects for potential investment, it does not guarantee the success of future funding applications. Each project must still follow an application process to show how it will deliver key participation outcomes, become a quality & sustainable facility and demonstrate suitable match-funding.

When a project is in a position to proceed, the Football Foundation will determine a suitable timeframe to submit a grant application and pre-application support will be provided by Leicestershire and Rutland County FA and the Football Foundation.

Set a 10-Year vision to transform local football facilities
Identify priority projects to be delivered
Act as an investment portfolio for projects that require funding
Be updated on a regular basis

How should this plan NOT be used?

A LFFP is an investment portfolio of priority projects for potential investment - it is not a detailed demand and supply analysis of all pitch provision in a local area. It cannot be used as a replacement for a playing pitch strategy (PPS) and it will not be accepted as an evidence base for site change of use or disposal.

A LFFP will however build on available/existing local evidence and strategic plans and may adopt relevant actions from a PPS and/or complement these with additional investment priorities.

National Context 2.png
National Conext 3.png

Rutland

02

Local area

Rutland is in the East Midlands region.

The current population of the Authority (ONS 2017 Mid-Year Estimate) is 39,474. This is expected to rise to 42,037 by 2039.

Rutland is ranked 37 out of 40 LAs in the region, and 294 out of 326 LAs nationally on the Indices of Multiple Deprivation (ONS).

Rutland's ethnic composition is primarily white (97.1 %). This is higher than the national average (85.4%).

The proportion of Rutland’s population represented by the BAME community is 2.9%. This is substantially below the national average (14.6%).

Demographics

  • 39,474 Current population (2017)
  • 42,037 Projected population (2039)
  • 37th most deprived out of 40 local authorities in the region
  • 294th most deprived out of 326 local authorities in England

Ethnicity data

  • Asian (0.98%)
  • Black (0.67%)
  • Mixed (1.04%)
  • Other (0.17%)
  • White (97.14%)
27%
27%
26%

% of people that are inactive

  • Rutland
  • Region
  • England

Lead-Rutland.jpg
download.jpg

Local partners

Local Authority

The Rutland County Council Corporate Plan was produced in 2017. The stated vision for Rutland is to ensure the County is a great place to live, learn, work, play and visit. To achieve this, the Authority aims to support the health and well-being needs of the community by ensuring that its sole leisure site (Catmose Sports Centre) continues to serve local residents and to develop a health and social care hub in Oakham in partnership with a number of local stakeholders.

The Authority's Playing Pitch Strategy is incorporated into its Sport and Recreation Facility Strategy and Open Space Informal Recreation Assessment, which was produced in 2015. It states that there is a requirement for 0.5 3G FTPs and there is overall sufficient grass pitch space for community football across all pitch types to cater for each age group.

County Football Association

Rutland is covered by the Leicestershire and Rutland County FA. It provides governance for, and development support to, all aspects of local football including coaches, referees, volunteers, clubs and leagues; supporting football for all. The County FA has a designated facilities investment lead officer who works to ensure the right facilities are located in the right locations.

Football Foundation

The Regional Engagement Manager and Regional Technical Project Manager at the Football Foundation work collaboratively with the County FA to provide pre-application support to priority projects for potential investment.

Football Foundation Investment

1 Total grants
  • £426,512 Total project cost
  • £106,762 Total grant value
  • 1 Sites improved
  • 1 New 3G FTPs
  • 0 Changing rooms / pavilions
  • 0 Grass pitches improved

See Football foundation website for more info (http://www.footballfoundation.org.uk/impact/where-our-money-goes)

Grant data above represents Football Foundation investment during the period 2000 - 2018.

Sport England

Has a network of planning managers who have a statutory role in the planning system to protect playing fields and provide consultation responses to planning applications relating to sporting facilities . They also play a key role in strategic planning for sports facilities, providing advice and support to local authorities to assess need for facilities in their local area.

Professional Community Club Organisations (CCOs)

These offer a variety of programmes and services to support local communities (sporting and non-sporting). There is no active CCO in Rutland, the nearest being Leicester City's Community Foundation or the Peterborough United Foundation.

Local Leisure Operator

Stevenage Leisure Ltd is the leisure operator in Rutland which runs Catmose Sports Centre. The Centre has a full size sand dressed AGP which is currently being used by some of the local football clubs to accommodate their training demand.

Local consultation

This has taken place with a cross-section of community groups in Rutland. Four individuals (representing four local organisations) were spoken to:

  • Rutland County Council
  • Oakham United
  • Royce Rangers
  • Ryhall Parish Council

(See Appendix B for full list of consultees)

local consultation 1
268464.JPG

Local football

Clubs

There are over 91,000 community football teams in England, spread over an expansive network of clubs and leagues. Rutland has a total of 63 teams.

The FA is investing to support clubs both on and off the pitch which includes an aim to have a qualified FA coach with every youth team by 2020/21. In addition, it will support 1,000 clubs to create full player pathways from youth to adult teams and develop 150 community football hubs with male and female pathways, disability and recreational playing opportunities.

Over the last 10-years there has been a significant national increase in the number of large multi-team football clubs. In Rutland (based upon 2018-19 affiliation data) one club has more than 10 registered teams: Royce Rangers (13 teams).

Affiliated Teams

63 Teams
  • 34 Adult male teams
  • 2 Adult female teams
  • 11 Youth male teams
  • 1 Youth female teams
  • 0 Disability teams
  • 15 Mini-soccer teams

The FA Whole Game System- season 2018/19. Total number of teams may include additional affiliated teams to those listed above, e.g. futsal teams.

Leagues

18 leagues operate in Leicestershire and Rutland. They offer competitive opportunities for many different players, including women and girls, disability, youth and adults. There are also male, female and youth futsal leagues in the County. The largest adult local leagues (2018-19) include:

  • The Alliance Football League – 74 teams– home and away
  • Leicester and Charnwood Sunday Football League – 43 teams– home and away
  • Leicestershire Senior League – 40 teams– home and away
  • Leicester City Football League- veterans – 40 teams– home and away
  • North Leicestershire Football League – 37 teams– home and away
  • Leicester and District Football League – 33 teams– home and away
  • Hinckley and District Sunday Football League - 21 teams– home and away
  • Leicestershire Senior County Women’s Football League - 11 teams– home and away

Leicestershire and Rutland's largest youth local leagues (2018-19) include:

  • Leicester and District Mutual Football League, U7-U10 – 452 teams– home and away
  • Leicester and District Sunday Junior U13-U15– 218 teams– home and away
  • Leicestershire Foxes Sunday League U11-U12 – 201 teams– home and away
  • Leicester City County Girls League U8-U18 – 142 teams– home and away
  • MDH Teamwear Leicestershire Youth League U16 – U18 – 89 teams– home and away
  • Leicestershire Midweek Floodlit Youth League U18 – 20 teams– home and away

Disability Football

There are 9.4 million people in England with a long-standing limiting disability, illness or condition which equates to 18% of the population – almost one in five. Football playing opportunities should be flexible, inclusive and accessible for everyone, whatever their level of ability. This could entail inclusion in mainstream activity or teams / sessions specifically for people with a disability.

In Rutland there are no football teams specifically for people with a disability. It is a priority of the County FA to introduce this provision. For talented players the FA runs regional centres and England national squads.

Disability 1
Disability 3

Women and Girls

The FA has big ambitions for the female game and aims to double levels of participation by 2020. To achieve this requires a combined effort across four pathways: education, recreation, competition and talent.

Education environments have a huge impact on the first experience of football for young girls. This pathway can offer many opportunities for females of all ages to develop and grow a lifelong interest in football.

FA Wildcats girls football centres provide the first step on the recreational pathway, the programme provides girls aged 5-11 with regular opportunities to play football in a fun and engaging environment. Leicestershire and Rutland operates a number of Wildcats girls sessions and the priority is to grow this activity to 15 successful and sustainable centres across the county by 2021.

There are three female teams in Rutland, which is comparable to local areas of a similar size. The County FA’s priority is to support existing clubs to grow and encourage more clubs to develop playing opportunities for females. The local girls league is the Leicester City County Girls U8-U18 League in which matches are played on a home and away basis. It is expected to grow its provision in future years particularly at mini soccer age groups. The local adult female league is the Leicestershire Senior County Women’s Football League. It too plays matches on a home and away basis and is expected to grow its provision in future years.

For talented players, the nearest FA Regional Talent Club (RTC) is Leicester City Women’s FC which is located in Leicester City. Higher level talent pathway opportunities are also provided regionally and nationally by the FA, culminating in the England Women’s national squads. The nearest Women’s Super League team is Leicester City Women’s FC which provides player pathway opportunities for gifted and talented female players and a spectator interest for fans.

Local Football 3.png
Local Football 4.png

Small Sided Football

Many different types of small-sided football are played in England, from teams and leagues to recreational and informal. It is an established and important part of the modern game.

Arrow and tshirts.png

Small-sided teams and leagues are organised and competitive activities; typically with players registered to clubs and affiliated to leagues and their County FAs. Examples include futsal and local small-sided leagues running at venues such as sports halls, 3G FTPs or small-sided 3G centres.

Due to the location of Rutland, sites in Corby and Peterborough have the closest small sided facilities. An example is the Powerleague site in Peterborough.

Futsal is an exciting, fast-paced, small sided team game that is widely played across the world. Typically it is played on an indoor surface with hockey-sized goals and a size 4 football with reduced ball bounce. It is the FA’s aim to ensure that futsal is available across the country. There are currently 106 futsal teams in Leicestershire and Rutland; they play in the Leicestershire Futsal Fives Female and Male Leagues and the Leicestershire and Rutland Youth Futsal League at key site locations including Crown Hills Community College, Judgemeadow Community College, Babington Academy and Brockington College. It is a priority for the County FA to grow both affiliated and recreational futsal.

Small sided 1.JPG
1072288.jpg

Recreational Football

Recreational football is played where facilities are typically booked and there might be someone to help organise. Examples include FA Just Play sessions, walking football and casual pitch hire for small-sided match play.

There are currently 12 FA Just Play centres in Leicestershire and Rutland and the County FA is working towards having 15 in place by 2021 . 16 walking football sessions are delivered at/by a range of community organisation including leisure centres, community centres and clubs. The County FA has prioritised walking football and Just Play for further growth. Other local recreational football programmes are primarily delivered through Leicester City Community Trust projects.

Informal football is played in local parks and green spaces – it is free, open access and often played spontaneously. Common examples include a kick-about at a local park or on a multi-use games area (MUGA).

Currently, informal football in Rutland is played at a number of parks sites, including Ryhall Playing Fields.

Summary

The key strengths of local football in Leicestershire and Rutland include the vibrant club structure and proven track record of investment into charter standard clubs. It is therefore recommended that the future football development priorities for Leicestershire and Rutland are:

1.Increasing access to, and provision of, 3G Football Turf Pitches for training and match play.

2.Improving changing room facilities for adult football.

3.Improving or enhancing facilities to support women and girls football.

4.Proving appropriate facilities to support participants within our BAME communities.

5.Working with clubs and partners to provide access to appropriate high quality facilities.

6.Developing or enabling access to suitable facilities countywide to support the development of futsal.

7.Providing opportunities to support informal provision and recreational play.

The facilities required to assist this are now set out in the Assets and opportunities section.

Each priority project that progresses to a funding application via the Football Foundation will produce a detailed ‘site development plan’ specifying all football development activity, usage and key partner engagement.

Assets and Opportunities

03

This section reviews existing football facility assets in (add local area). It identifies current issues and presents opportunities for improvements, including a list of priority projects for potential investment.

Local assets and opportunities have been reviewed inline with four investment priorities:

  • 3G Football Turf Pitches (FTPs)
  • Improved grass pitches
  • Changing room pavilions / clubhouses
  • Small sided facilities

To ensure a consistent and high quality approach, each local area has been reviewed applying a standard approach, supplemented by input from consultation with local partners and stakeholder organisations.

While each investment priority is reviewed individually, it is understood that they can be inter-reliant; account is, thus, taken of these potential connections.

3G 2.png

3G Football Turf Pitches (FTPs)

Grass 2.png

Improved grass pitches

Changing room 2.png

Changing room pavilions/ clubhouses

SS Facilities 2.png

Small sided facilities

3G Football Turf Pitches (FTP's)

04

3G FTPs are a high quality and indispensable part of modern football facilities; their impact cannot be underestimated. In recent years the industry has seen major innovations and improvements to artificial surfaces (and sports lighting). This has created playing surfaces that replicate a good standard natural turf pitch whilst significantly increasing levels of use (x20). All FTPs must have sports lighting to achieve this.

The high quality, consistent playing surface is the ideal environment to play the game and for young people to learn. With regular maintenance programmes, FTPs can be heavily used all year round with no decline in quality. They almost completely negate annoying fixture cancellations during winter months, helping football to be a key part of a regular physical activity habit.

High capacity levels offer a great opportunity to embrace all formats and engage all participants. A full-sized 3G caters for an average of 1,200 participants per week and is suitable for various location types. That means being fully inclusive to all sections of the community, with a particular focus on under-represented groups such as women and girls, people with a disability, BAME communities and people from lower socio-economic groups.

The way 3G FTPs are used is rapidly changing; current line-marking systems allow for match play across all formats of football (5v5, 7v7, 9v9 and 11v11). This enables significant levels of match-play to be transferred from grass to 3G.

3G 1.png
3G 2.png

Assets and opportunities

There is no current PPS and, therefore, demand for full sized 3G FTPs has been calculated using the FA training ratio model 1:38.

The one existing full-sized (11 v 11) 3G FTP in Rutland is located at Uppingham Community College. The carpet was replaced in July 2019, is available for community use and is on the FA Register for 3G FTPs (meaning that it has been quality checked and can be used for football match play).

On the basis that there are 63 teams in Rutland, there is a requirement for 1.6 full sized 3G FTPs, resulting in the need for a smaller sided 3G FTP to address demand. It must also be noted that a full size pitch is also being proposed at Stamford (South Kesteven) to the east of the Authority which will accommodate some demand from Rutland.

The key provision gap is in Oakham and consultation with clubs in the town confirms the need for a facility to meet local demand. The proposal made in this plan will help to address this.

1 Current full sized 3G FTP
0 Full sized 3G FTP project
1 Small sided 3G FTP projects

Priority projects

One priority project for potential investment is identified, which is a new pitch in Oakham.

1

3G FTP (Oakham)

Location

Location details: Unknown - Oakham Area

Facilities
  • New 7v7 Floodlit 3G FTP (1)
Owner

Not known

Deliverability score

Low (1/4)

NFFS outcome score

2.0/4

Overall score

41% (4.9/12)

Notes

There is a need for a 3G pitch in the town of Oakham to support both football clubs (Royce Rangers and Oakham United). The total number of affiliated teams from both clubs is. c. 20 teams, which would not justify a full size pitch. Therefore the preferred size of a pitch will be a 61m x 43m to accommodate junior match play and senior training demand. The precise location of the pitch is not yet identified and further feasibility work is required to identify such site.

Project Focus

Mini-soccer; Small-sided recreational; Small-sided teams and leagues; Youth female; Youth male

A project's overall score provides an indication of its potential outcomes and deliverability only (weighted twice as much towards the outcomes score). It does not impact the likelihood or level of any potential investment.

Priority 3G projects

Pitchfinder

Improved grass pitches

05

Playing fields are one of the most important resources for sport in England. All football players should have the opportunity to play on good quality grass pitches. However, FA data shows that 63% of pitches in England are poor / low quality and one in six games are cancelled. As such, poor pitch quality is consistently cited as the number one issue for players.

The priority is, therefore, to sustainably improve grass pitch quality across all main pitch owners (local authorities, education establishments and clubs). However, the level of maintenance required to obtain good quality standards is regularly affected by restricted budgets and limited knowledge/ training. Compaction and grass coverage are two key causes of poor quality pitches. Both are commonly treated via a maintenance driven solution (and do not necessarily require costly drainage schemes).

Playing fields are also a valuable resources for informal play and open-access sites are encouraged but, for many, problems such as dog fouling and vandalism mean that they need to be protected with mitigation measures such as fencing.

The key challenge is to create a sustainable approach to provide good quality football pitches for the long term. Most local authorities (78%) intend to increase pitch hire fees in the future. However, the majority of players (63%) believe facilities are already expensive and some (16%) believe prices are prohibitive. A sustainable solution should, therefore, carefully balance pitch quality and affordability.

While the education sector (37%) and local authorities (32%) are still the principal asset owners of grass pitches, clubs / leagues own or maintain an increasing share (currently 25%). Assets and opportunities have been considered across each sector.

Although large (3+ pitch) strategic sites are important and make up much of the project list within the LFFPs, this does not mean that other club, league and community/voluntary sites are not important or eligible for funding. These sites are key to the Football Foundation's Grass Pitch Programme to deliver 20,000 good quality pitches.

For more information click here.

PitchPower

The PitchPower app is the gateway to any grass pitch improvement funding. It is the tool that will allow clubs and organisations to complete pitch inspections and access funds.

If you haven't signed up and completed a PitchPower pitch inspection, you will need to do this before you can apply for the Grass Pitch Maintenance Fund.

Learn more by clicking here.

Grass 1.png
Grass 2.png

Assets and opportunities

There are currently five grass pitch sites in Rutland with three or more full-size pitch equivalents (or with fewer than three pitches but deemed to be of strategic importance). These contain 18 grass pitches.

Of the five key pitch sites referenced, three have been prioritised for improvement. This will affect the quality of 12 pitches:

Priority projects

5 Key grass pitch sites
3 Sites prioritised for improvement
12 Full size pitch equivalents at these sites

Three priority projects for potential investment are identified. Pitch quality rating was evidenced by local partners. Prioritisation was based on a rationale of selecting sites in poor condition where improvement can make a significant difference to local community football.

4

Rutland Showground (Royce Rangers FC)

Location

Burley Park Way , LE15 6US

Facilities
  • New Changing Pavilion (1)
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (8)
Owner

Football club

Deliverability score

Medium (2/4)

NFFS outcome score

2.2/4

Overall score

53% (6.3/12)

Notes

Existing facilities: 8 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion.

Current users: Royce Rangers FC

Rationale: Changing rooms need to be enhanced to support club. Investment will be required. Club may have to be relocated elsewhere on the site - and new changing rooms provided as a result.

Project Focus

Mini-soccer; Youth female; Youth male

5

Ryhall Playing Fields/Meadow Playing Fields

Location

MEADOW PLAYING FIELDS Parkfield Road, Ryhall, Stamford, , PE9 4ER

Facilities
  • Small sided informal (MUGA) (1)
  • Refurbish Changing Pavilion (1)
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (2)
Owner

Other

Deliverability score

Low (1/4)

NFFS outcome score

1.9/4

Overall score

40% (4.8/12)

Notes

Existing facilities:2 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion

Current users: One Touch Football

Rationale: Poor quality changing pavilion, upgrade required. In addition, a MUGA at the site would also support the local football club with an additional facility. The site is popular for recreational football in the village.

Project Focus

Adult male; Mini-soccer; Small-sided informal; Small-sided recreational; Youth female; Youth male

6

Oakham United Football Club

Location

OAKHAM UNITED FC MAIN ROAD, BARLEYTHORPE, OAKHAM, , LE15 7EE

Facilities
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (2)
Owner

Football club

Deliverability score

Medium (2/4)

NFFS outcome score

2.5/4

Overall score

59% (7.1/12)

Notes

Existing facilities: 2 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion,

Current users: Oakham United FC

Rationale: Poor quality grass pitches, investment required.

Project Focus

Adult female; Adult male; Youth female; Youth male

A project's overall score provides an indication of its potential outcomes and deliverability only (weighted twice as much towards the outcomes score). It does not impact the likelihood or level of any potential investment.

Priority grass pitch sites

Pitchfinder

Changing room pavilions / clubhouses

06

These can provide a number of different benefits. While the primary function is normally the provision of changing rooms to accommodate match-play and training (for players and officials), there can be equal value in facilities such as community and education rooms, catering facilities and spectator toilets.

Each project will take a progressive approach to pavilions and clubhouses (beyond the provision of changing rooms) and be open to new opportunities to engage the whole community. That means, creating environments that are welcoming to players, spectators, volunteers, officials and all sections of the community.

Such assets should support other investment priorities (e.g. 3G FTPs and grass pitches) and be located at sites that will have the greatest impact on local communities. To ensure this, focus is given to sites with three or more full-size pitch equivalents. However, as pitch quality is the number one priority for players this is prioritised before investment in changing room pavilions /clubhouses.

Clearly, facilities need to be well managed and maintained to keep them in a good state of repair. Consideration will be given to reviewing the best operator solution for key sites and the installation of revenue generating features such as catering facilities and community rooms. To achieve this, business plan support will be given to each priority project as it progresses to an application to the Football Foundation.

Changing room 1.png
Changing room 2.png

Assets and opportunities

Of the five key grass pitch sites in Rutland with three or more full-size pitch equivalents (or with fewer than three pitches but of strategic importance) three have suitable changing rooms and two sites require improvement/replacement.

3 Key sites have suitable changing rooms / pavillions / clubhouses
2 Require improvement / replacement
0 Have no facilities and require new builds

Priority projects

Two priority projects for potential investment are identified:

4

Rutland Showground (Royce Rangers FC)

Location

Burley Park Way , LE15 6US

Facilities
  • New Changing Pavilion (1)
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (8)
Owner

Football club

Deliverability score

Medium (2/4)

NFFS outcome score

2.2/4

Overall score

53% (6.3/12)

Notes

Existing facilities: 8 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion.

Current users: Royce Rangers FC

Rationale: Changing rooms need to be enhanced to support club. Investment will be required. Club may have to be relocated elsewhere on the site - and new changing rooms provided as a result.

Project Focus

Mini-soccer; Youth female; Youth male

5

Ryhall Playing Fields/Meadow Playing Fields

Location

MEADOW PLAYING FIELDS Parkfield Road, Ryhall, Stamford, , PE9 4ER

Facilities
  • Small sided informal (MUGA) (1)
  • Refurbish Changing Pavilion (1)
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (2)
Owner

Other

Deliverability score

Low (1/4)

NFFS outcome score

1.9/4

Overall score

40% (4.8/12)

Notes

Existing facilities:2 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion

Current users: One Touch Football

Rationale: Poor quality changing pavilion, upgrade required. In addition, a MUGA at the site would also support the local football club with an additional facility. The site is popular for recreational football in the village.

Project Focus

Adult male; Mini-soccer; Small-sided informal; Small-sided recreational; Youth female; Youth male

A project's overall score provides an indication of its potential outcomes and deliverability only (weighted twice as much towards the outcomes score). It does not impact the likelihood or level of any potential investment.

Priority changing room projects

Pitchfinder

Small sided facilities

07

Good facilities are important to all small sided football players, but it is important to understand the different formats of the small-sided game and the various facility types they relate to.

Research suggests that small-sided players in teams and leagues, and in recreational sessions, prefer a 3G surface type because it replicates a good standard natural turf pitch. These facilities have already been covered in the 3G FTP section of this LFFP.

Indoor environments currently accommodate 20% of football participation and are also popular with players in teams and leagues and recreational sessions. Indoor sports halls are most popular, along with some community halls and indoor 3G centres. Environments need to be engaging, have clear line-marking and the correct size goalposts.

Informal players require facilities that are open and free to access as this enables play opportunities that are often spontaneous. In these circumstances multi-use games areas (MUGAs) can be effective in areas of high urban population and limited green space. Such facilities can be modern, bright, creative and engaging. While this plan will identify suitable locations for such facilities, the design and specifics of the facility type can be agreed at a later stage with Football Foundation staff when projects are ready to progress to pre-application stage.

Parks and open green spaces are also important to informal play and require goalposts and zones that are free from litter and dog fouling.

SS Facilities 2.png
1264581.JPG

Priority projects

0 Improved indoor spaces
2 MUGAs
0 Better parks / open green spaces

Indoor

Local consultation did not indicate any indoor facilities that require improvement to develop small sided football.

Multi Use Games Area (MUGA)

Local consultation has led to two potential opportunities to develop MUGAs being identified. In each case the rationale is based on the site being in an area where it is thought that there is likely to be high recreational demand.

Parks and open green spaces

No parks or open green spaces presently require improvement to develop small sided football, however, further consultation is required to determine whether investment in to recreational football in parks is required.

5

Ryhall Playing Fields/Meadow Playing Fields

Location

MEADOW PLAYING FIELDS Parkfield Road, Ryhall, Stamford, , PE9 4ER

Facilities
  • Small sided informal (MUGA) (1)
  • Refurbish Changing Pavilion (1)
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (2)
Owner

Other

Deliverability score

Low (1/4)

NFFS outcome score

1.9/4

Overall score

40% (4.8/12)

Notes

Existing facilities:2 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion

Current users: One Touch Football

Rationale: Poor quality changing pavilion, upgrade required. In addition, a MUGA at the site would also support the local football club with an additional facility. The site is popular for recreational football in the village.

Project Focus

Adult male; Mini-soccer; Small-sided informal; Small-sided recreational; Youth female; Youth male

7

Oakham Enterprise Park

Location

, LE15 7TU

Facilities
  • Small sided informal (MUGA) (1)
Owner

Local Authority

Deliverability score

Medium (2/4)

NFFS outcome score

1.9/4

Overall score

48% (5.8/12)

Notes

Upgrade of old MUGA/small sided provision which can be utilised by Active Rutland, who deliver a number of health related activities at the site.

Project Focus

Disability; Small-sided informal; Small-sided recreational

A project's overall score provides an indication of its potential outcomes and deliverability only (weighted twice as much towards the outcomes score). It does not impact the likelihood or level of any potential investment.

Appendix A: Priority project list

08

This list sets out all priority projects for potential investment. Each has been scored against two principal factors: deliverability and outcomes (quality, inclusivity, sustainability, engagement and usage).

The list will be used flexibly; project ‘rating’ does not determine the exact order in which it will progress to a funding application to the Football Foundation as many factors influence this. The process for moving a project from this list and into the ‘pre-application stage’ will be managed by the Football Foundation.

6

Oakham United Football Club

Location

OAKHAM UNITED FC MAIN ROAD, BARLEYTHORPE, OAKHAM, , LE15 7EE

Facilities
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (2)
Owner

Football club

Deliverability score

Medium (2/4)

NFFS outcome score

2.5/4

Overall score

59% (7.1/12)

Notes

Existing facilities: 2 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion,

Current users: Oakham United FC

Rationale: Poor quality grass pitches, investment required.

Project Focus

Adult female; Adult male; Youth female; Youth male

4

Rutland Showground (Royce Rangers FC)

Location

Burley Park Way , LE15 6US

Facilities
  • New Changing Pavilion (1)
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (8)
Owner

Football club

Deliverability score

Medium (2/4)

NFFS outcome score

2.2/4

Overall score

53% (6.3/12)

Notes

Existing facilities: 8 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion.

Current users: Royce Rangers FC

Rationale: Changing rooms need to be enhanced to support club. Investment will be required. Club may have to be relocated elsewhere on the site - and new changing rooms provided as a result.

Project Focus

Mini-soccer; Youth female; Youth male

7

Oakham Enterprise Park

Location

, LE15 7TU

Facilities
  • Small sided informal (MUGA) (1)
Owner

Local Authority

Deliverability score

Medium (2/4)

NFFS outcome score

1.9/4

Overall score

48% (5.8/12)

Notes

Upgrade of old MUGA/small sided provision which can be utilised by Active Rutland, who deliver a number of health related activities at the site.

Project Focus

Disability; Small-sided informal; Small-sided recreational

1

3G FTP (Oakham)

Location

Location details: Unknown - Oakham Area

Facilities
  • New 7v7 Floodlit 3G FTP (1)
Owner

Not known

Deliverability score

Low (1/4)

NFFS outcome score

2.0/4

Overall score

41% (4.9/12)

Notes

There is a need for a 3G pitch in the town of Oakham to support both football clubs (Royce Rangers and Oakham United). The total number of affiliated teams from both clubs is. c. 20 teams, which would not justify a full size pitch. Therefore the preferred size of a pitch will be a 61m x 43m to accommodate junior match play and senior training demand. The precise location of the pitch is not yet identified and further feasibility work is required to identify such site.

Project Focus

Mini-soccer; Small-sided recreational; Small-sided teams and leagues; Youth female; Youth male

5

Ryhall Playing Fields/Meadow Playing Fields

Location

MEADOW PLAYING FIELDS Parkfield Road, Ryhall, Stamford, , PE9 4ER

Facilities
  • Small sided informal (MUGA) (1)
  • Refurbish Changing Pavilion (1)
  • Natural grass pitch improvements (2)
Owner

Other

Deliverability score

Low (1/4)

NFFS outcome score

1.9/4

Overall score

40% (4.8/12)

Notes

Existing facilities:2 x full size pitch equivalents, changing pavilion

Current users: One Touch Football

Rationale: Poor quality changing pavilion, upgrade required. In addition, a MUGA at the site would also support the local football club with an additional facility. The site is popular for recreational football in the village.

Project Focus

Adult male; Mini-soccer; Small-sided informal; Small-sided recreational; Youth female; Youth male

A project's overall score provides an indication of its potential outcomes and deliverability only (weighted twice as much towards the outcomes score). It does not impact the likelihood or level of any potential investment.

Appendix B: Consultation list

09

A range of local agencies and larger (usually 10 plus team) local football clubs were invited to participate in the LFFP consultation. Those that contributed are listed below:

  • Rutland County Council: Head of Culture and Regeneration
  • Rutland County Council: Portfolio Holder for Culture
  • Ryhall Parish Council: Parish Clerk
  • Oakham United: Club Secretary
  • Royce Rangers: Chairman

Share the full Rutland plan